Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
Neurosurg Focus ; 48(6): E12, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32480373

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to evaluate clinical and laboratory data from pituitary adenoma (PA) patients with functioning PA (associated with acromegaly [n = 10] or Cushing disease [n = 10]) or nonfunctioning PA (NFPA; n = 10) that were classified according to 2017 WHO criteria (based on the expression of the transcription factors pituitary-specific positive transcription factor 1 [Pit-1], a transcription factor member of the T-box family [Tpit], and steroidogenic factor 1 [SF-1]) and to assess the immunostaining results for growth hormone (GH) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) in the corresponding tumors. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data were collected retrospectively. The percentage of tumoral cells positive for Pit-1, Tpit, or SF-1 was assessed and ImageJ software was used to evaluate immunopositivity in PAs with 2 different antibodies against GH (primary antibody 1 [AbGH-1] and primary antibody 2 [AbGH-2]) and 2 different antibodies against ACTH (primary antibody 1 [AbACTH-1] and primary antibody 2 [AbACTH-2]). RESULTS: Cells with positive Pit-1 staining were more frequently observed in lesions from patients with acromegaly (acromegaly group) than in lesions from patients with Cushing disease (Cushing group; p < 0.001) and those from patients with NFPA (NFPA group; p < 0.001). The percentage of Tpit-positive cells was higher in the Cushing group than in the acromegaly (p < 0.001) and NFPA (p < 0.001) groups. No difference was detected regarding SF-1 frequency among all groups (p = 0.855). In acromegalic individuals, GH immunostaining levels varied depending on the antibody employed, and only one of the antibodies (AbGH-2) yielded higher values in comparison with the values for NFPA patients (p < 0.001). For all of the antibodies employed, no significant correlations were detected between GH tissue expression and the laboratory data (serum GH vs AbGH-1, p = 0.933; serum GH vs AbGH-2, p = 0.853; serum insulin-like growth factor-1 [IGF-1] vs AbGH-1, p = 0.407; serum IGF-1 vs AbGH-2, p = 0.881). In the Cushing group data, both antibodies showed similar ACTH tissue expression, which was higher than that obtained in the NFPA group (p < 0.001). There were no significant associations between ACTH immunohistochemical findings and ACTH serum levels (serum ACTH vs AbACTH-1, p = 0.651; serum ACTH vs AbACTH-2, p = 0.987). However, ACTH immunostaining evaluated with AbACTH-1 showed a significant correlation with 24-hour urinary cortisol (24-hour cortisol vs AbACTH-1, p = 0.047; 24-hour cortisol vs AbACTH-2, p = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: Immunostaining for Pit-1 and Tpit accurately identified lesions associated with acromegaly and Cushing disease, respectively. Conversely, SF-1 did not differentiate NFPA from lesions of the other two groups. Regarding hormonal tissue detection, results of the current investigation indicate that different antibodies may lead not only to divergent immunohistochemical results but also to lack of correlation with laboratory findings. Finally, PA classification based on transcription factor expression (Pit-1, Tpit, and SF-1), as proposed by the 2017 WHO classification of pituitary tumors, may avoid the limitations of PA classification based solely on digital immunohistochemical detection of hormones.


Subject(s)
Acromegaly/classification , Adenoma/classification , Pituitary ACTH Hypersecretion/classification , Pituitary Neoplasms/classification , Preoperative Care/classification , World Health Organization , Acromegaly/blood , Acromegaly/surgery , Adenoma/blood , Adenoma/surgery , Adrenocorticotropic Hormone/blood , Adult , Female , Human Growth Hormone/blood , Humans , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Pituitary ACTH Hypersecretion/blood , Pituitary ACTH Hypersecretion/surgery , Pituitary Neoplasms/blood , Pituitary Neoplasms/surgery , Preoperative Care/methods , Retrospective Studies , Staining and Labeling/classification , Staining and Labeling/methods
2.
South Med J ; 110(2): 79-82, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28158875

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Before an endoscopic procedure, an evaluation to assess the risk of sedation is performed by the gastroenterologist. To risk stratify based on medical problems, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification scores are used routinely in the preprocedure evaluation. The objective of our study was to evaluate among physicians the ASA score accuracy pre-endoscopic procedures. METHODS: At a single tertiary-care center an institutional review board-approved retrospective study was performed. Upper endoscopies performed from May 2012 through August 2013 were reviewed; data were collected and recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and linear weighted kappa analysis for agreement (≤0.20 is poor agreement, 0.21-0.40 is fair, 0.41-0.60 is moderate, 0.61-0.80 is good, and 0.81-1.00 is very good). RESULTS: The mean ASA scores by the gastroenterologist compared with the anesthesiologist were 2.28 ± 0.56 and 2.78 ± 0.60, respectively, with only fair agreement (weighted kappa index 0.223, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.113-0.333; 48% agreement). The mean ASA scores for gastroenterologists compared with other gastroenterologists were 2.26 ± 0.5 and 2.26 ± 0.44, respectively, with poor agreement (weighted kappa index 0.200, 95% CI 0.108-0.389; 68% agreement). Agreement on ASA scores was only moderate between the gastroenterologist and himself or herself (weighted kappa index 0.464, 95% CI 0.183-0.745; 75% agreement). CONCLUSIONS: Gastroenterologists performing preprocedure assessments of ASA scores have fair agreement with anesthesiologists, poor agreement with other gastroenterologists, and only moderate agreement with themselves. Given this level of inaccuracy, it appears that the ASA score pre-endoscopy is of limited significance.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiology/methods , Conscious Sedation/adverse effects , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Gastroenterologists/standards , Preoperative Care , Risk Assessment , Aged , Conscious Sedation/methods , Data Accuracy , Endoscopy, Digestive System/adverse effects , Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods , Endoscopy, Digestive System/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care/classification , Preoperative Care/methods , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/standards , United States
3.
Respirology ; 19(4): 524-30, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24612306

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Endobronchial valve (EBV) therapy is optimized in patients who demonstrate little or no collateral ventilation (CV). The accuracy of the Chartis System and visual assessment of high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) fissure completeness by a core radiology laboratory for classifying CV status was compared by evaluating the relationship of each method with target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) after EBV placement. METHODS: Retrospective HRCT fissure analysis of a study population who underwent catheter-based measurement of CV followed by complete occlusion of the targeted lobe by EBV. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the HRCT fissure analysis and the catheter-based measurement of CV for predicting TLVR was determined. RESULTS: Accuracy for correctly classifying TLVR with EBV was similar for Chartis System and HRCT fissure analysis (74 vs 77%). The sensitivity and specificity of the Chartis measurement were 86% and 61% and those of HRCT fissure analysis 75% and 79%. Patients with TLVR ≥ 350 mL had statistically significant improvement in respiratory function, exercise performance and quality of life measures. CONCLUSIONS: When evaluating patients for likelihood of successful EBV therapy, the Chartis System CV assessment and HRCT fissure analysis appear to have comparable accuracy. Both techniques were found to be beneficial for EBV procedure planning.


Subject(s)
Bronchoscopy/methods , Pneumonectomy/methods , Preoperative Care , Pulmonary Emphysema , Aged , Airway Management/methods , Exercise Tolerance , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Preoperative Care/classification , Preoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/standards , Pulmonary Emphysema/diagnosis , Pulmonary Emphysema/physiopathology , Pulmonary Emphysema/psychology , Pulmonary Ventilation/physiology , Quality of Life , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Treatment Outcome
6.
Rev. méd. Minas Gerais ; 20(4)out.-dez. 2010. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-577589

ABSTRACT

O avanço da tecnologia permitiu que a propedêutica pré-operatória, a monitorização e a terapêutica se tornassem mais adequadas para os cardiopatas, que são, cada vez mais, submetidos aos mais complexos procedimentos cirúrgicos. A avaliação pré-anestésica é fundamental em todos os pacientes, no intuito de oferecer o melhor cuidado possível.A integração entre o anestesista, o cardiologista e o cirurgião é essencial para o sucesso no tratamento. Com o objetivo de se predizer o risco cardíaco e, mais importante que isto, formular estratégias para melhorar o estado clínico no pré-operatório, vários índices foram elaborados e reavaliados, apresentando boa correlação. O clínico envolvido no tratamento de pacientes cardiopatas deve conhecer as interações medicamentosas, exames pré-operatórios necessários e a conduta perioperatória adequada para cada situação específica.


The advancement of technology allowed the preoperative workup, monitoring and therapy to become more suitable for cardiac patients, who are increasingly undergoing the most complex surgical procedures. The pre-anesthetic evaluation is essential in all patients in order to provide the best possible care. The integration between the anesthesiologist, the cardiologist and surgeon is essential for a successful treatment. In order to predict cardiac risk and, more important than this, to formulate strategies to improve the preoperative clinical status, several indices have been prepared and reviewed, showing good correlation. The clinician involved in treating patients with heart disease should be aware of drug interactions, necessary preoperative tests and perioperative management appropriate for each specific situation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anesthesia , Heart Diseases , Preoperative Care/classification , Coronary Angiography/standards , Monitoring, Physiologic
7.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 64(5): 387-92, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19488602

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: We determined the degree of risk produced by the association of other surgical procedures with surgical myocardial revascularization in octogenarian patients and identified the risk factors that best explain hospital mortality. METHODS: This study was an observational analytical historical cohort study involving octogenarians operated on at our institution between January 1, 2000 and January 1, 2005. We stratified the objective population as follows: Group 1 comprised octogenarians revascularized without associated procedures, and Group 2 comprised octogenarians revascularized with associated procedures. Statistical analyses included the t test for independent samples and multiple logistic regression analysis. Significance was accepted with an alpha error of 5%. RESULTS: Univariate analyses revealed the following clinical and statistically significant variables: hospital mortality (P=0.002), diabetes mellitus (P=0.017), preoperative endocarditis (P=0.001), cardiogenic shock (P=0.019), use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (P=0.026), preoperative risk score (Parsonnet), P<0.001, procedure associated with revascularization (P<0.001), medium number of affected coronary arteries (P<0.001), use of extracorporeal circulation (P<0.001), time of extracorporeal circulation (P<0.001), number of distal anastomoses (P=0.002), graft type (P<0.001), postoperative breathing support (P<0.001), stroke (P<0.001), infection (P=0.002), creatinine level (P=0.018), and quality of life score (P=0.050). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: In octogenarian patients, the need for a procedure associated with surgical myocardial revascularization produces an absolute increase in hospital mortality risk of 45%. The variables that contributed to hospital mortality were preoperative endocarditis, preoperative cardiogenic shock, the use of extracorporeal circulation, the length of time of extracorporeal circulation, postoperative creatinine level, and postoperative need for prolonged respiratory support.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Circulation/adverse effects , Hospital Mortality , Myocardial Revascularization/adverse effects , Postoperative Care/adverse effects , Preoperative Care/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Diabetes Complications , Endocarditis/complications , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Humans , Male , Myocardial Revascularization/mortality , Postoperative Care/classification , Preoperative Care/classification , Shock, Cardiogenic/complications
9.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 90(3): 388-94, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19254601

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the preoperative effects of multidimensional land-based and pool-based exercise programs for people awaiting joint replacement surgery of the hip or knee. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind, before-after trial. SETTING: Physiotherapy gymnasium and hydrotherapy pool. PARTICIPANTS: Patients awaiting elective hip or knee joint replacement surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Land-based (n=40) or pool-based exercise program (n=42). Each 6-week program included an education session, twice-weekly exercise classes, and an occupational therapy home assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants were assessed immediately before and after the 6-week intervention, then 8 weeks later. Primary outcomes were pain and self-reported function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) and patient global assessment. Secondary outcomes were performance-based measures (timed walk and chair stand) and psychosocial status (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey mental component score). Pain was also measured before and after each exercise class on a 7-point verbal rating scale. RESULTS: Although both interventions were effective in reducing pain and improving function, there were no postintervention differences between the groups for the primary and secondary outcomes. However, the pool-based group had less pain immediately after the exercise classes. CONCLUSIONS: While our multidimensional exercise-based interventions appeared to be effective in reducing disability in those awaiting joint replacement surgery of the hip or knee, there were no large differences in the postintervention effects of the interventions. However, pool-based exercise appeared to have a more favorable effect on pain immediately after the exercise classes.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/rehabilitation , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy/classification , Occupational Therapy/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/prevention & control , Preoperative Care/classification , Single-Blind Method , Swimming , Treatment Outcome
10.
Clinics ; 64(5): 387-392, 2009. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-514738

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: We determined the degree of risk produced by the association of other surgical procedures with surgical myocardial revascularization in octogenarian patients and identified the risk factors that best explain hospital mortality. METHODS: This study was an observational analytical historical cohort study involving octogenarians operated on at our institution between January 1, 2000 and January 1, 2005. We stratified the objective population as follows: Group 1 comprised octogenarians revascularized without associated procedures, and Group 2 comprised octogenarians revascularized with associated procedures. Statistical analyses included the t test for independent samples and multiple logistic regression analysis. Significance was accepted with an alpha error of 5 percent. RESULTS: Univariate analyses revealed the following clinical and statistically significant variables: hospital mortality (P=0.002), diabetes mellitus (P=0.017), preoperative endocarditis (P=0.001), cardiogenic shock (P=0.019), use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (P=0.026), preoperative risk score (Parsonnet), P<0.001, procedure associated with revascularization (P<0.001), medium number of affected coronary arteries (P<0.001), use of extracorporeal circulation (P<0.001), time of extracorporeal circulation (P<0.001), number of distal anastomoses (P=0.002), graft type (P<0.001), postoperative breathing support (P<0.001), stroke (P<0.001), infection (P=0.002), creatinine level (P=0.018), and quality of life score (P=0.050). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: In octogenarian patients, the need for a procedure associated with surgical myocardial revascularization produces an absolute increase in hospital mortality risk of 45 percent. The variables that contributed to hospital mortality were preoperative endocarditis, preoperative cardiogenic shock, the use of extracorporeal circulation, the length of time of extracorporeal circulation, postoperative creatinine level, ...


Subject(s)
Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Extracorporeal Circulation/adverse effects , Hospital Mortality , Myocardial Revascularization/adverse effects , Postoperative Care/adverse effects , Preoperative Care/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Diabetes Complications , Epidemiologic Methods , Endocarditis/complications , Myocardial Revascularization/mortality , Postoperative Care/classification , Preoperative Care/classification , Shock, Cardiogenic/complications
14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9558538

ABSTRACT

Although orthognathic surgery has now become a routine part of oral and maxillofacial surgery practice, the complexity of such surgery together with the detailed planning involved makes it a difficult area of surgery to follow in the literature. The plethora of literature on the subject of complications in orthognathic surgery makes it essential to devise a simple classification of complications so that comparative studies can be identified and grouped together for more meaningful interpretation. The aim of this article is to present a brief and coherent overview of the main complications associated with orthognathic surgery for the purpose of establishing a simple classification of complications for future reference.


Subject(s)
Intraoperative Complications/classification , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Postoperative Complications/classification , Humans , Osteotomy/adverse effects , Preoperative Care/classification
16.
In. Braz, José Reinaldo Cerqueira; Auler Junior, José Otávio; Costa Amaral, José Luiz Gomes; Coriat, Pierre. O sistema cardiovascular e a anestesia. Säo Paulo, EDUNESP, 1997. p.67-76.
Monography in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-205823
17.
In. Carreiräo, Sérgio; Lessa, Sergio; Zanini, Silvio A. Tratamento das fissuras labiopalatinas. Rio de Janeiro, Revinter, 2.ed; 1996. p.159-71, ilus. (BR).
Monography in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: lil-250484
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...